My Love Affair With Pen Computers
(Pen Computing #5, April 1996)
My love affair with pens began in 1991 after reading an article on the
GRiDPad pen computer. Being a PC person from the early beginnings, I was enamored
with the concept of a small, keyboardless computer that I could actually carry
with me. All those dreams of Start Trek like devices came rushing into view and I
immediately began to collect all I could find about pen computing.
After several weeks and numerous phone calls to GRiD, I discovered
that my own company, Consolidated Edison of New York, had actually done some
research in pens and had possession of a few GRiDPad computers. I managed to
reach the manager in charge of the small pen project and convinced him to let me
borrow one of those miracles.
A few days later it arrived. The GRiDPad was a marvel to behold. It
weighed about five pounds, had a greenish reflective screen, two PCMCIA Type I
memory slots (very rare then!) and a tethered pen. Though it only had a 8088
chip, the pen demo programs captivated me. I did a little more digging and found
my company's Information Systems resident expert on pens. We soon became friends,
probably because I was the only one he knew who was even remotely interested in
this obscure area of personal computing.
So my newfound IS friend explained how GRiD and the GRiDPad device
had pretty much been the only real (as in actully available) game in town since 1988. He introduced me to
the PenPal development environment and showqed me how easy it was to develop
applications for DOS based pen machines. I borrowed his PenPal system for a while
so I could explore pen development on my own.
For the next few days I was deep in a world of radio buttons, pick lists,
text recognition boxes, and LapLink. I designed a couple of small applications
for use in my daily activities and used the unit extensively for about four
weeks. My colleagues saw me carrying the GRiDPad around all day and I
enthusiastically preached its virtues. I didn't tell them about my growing
depression. The GRiDPad's screen was hard to see, the unit was slow, it had
little memory, and getting data in and out of the unit meant you had to be a
LapLink expert.
It was clear that pen technology had not yet reached the level of maturity
needed to make it truly useful. After a month of pen computing, I returned the
little GRiDPad. But I retained my vision, my enthusiasm, and a pen computing
friend in Vinny who continued to share his pen experiences with me.
Other pen systems began appearing on the market. GRiD itself was pushing
its new PalmPad, a very small, almost wearable, DOS-based pen machine whose
strongest suit was a ruggedized and weather-proofed case. But imagine our
surprise (and embarrassment) when a sample PalmPad literally went up in smoke
when getting wet during a demonstration for a company vice president in an
underground facility.
During that same period we established an ongoing relationship with
MicroSlate, a Canadian engineering firm with really cool hardware. MicroSlate had
just introduced its Datellite pen computer, a very rugged, modular unit with a
touch sensitive screen and a lunchbox design. The thing was downright ugly but
rock solid. A MicroSlate sales representative actually tossed it down hallways in
a vivid demonstration of the computer's durability. MicroSlate had substantial
pen computer design and engineering expertise and offered to design a custom
machine to ConEd's specification. Alas, such an investment was far too radical
for a conservative company to accept.
The pen computer spark came alive again in May of 1992 when Apple
Computer's John Sculley held up this little back box the size of a paperback on a
TV show and told the world of his grand vision. Few viewers knew that that
particular little box only ran for about 20 minutes on a fresh set of AAA
batteries, or that some naming consultants had suggested calling it the ZippyPad.
Well, it would be another year before I got my own ZippyPad.
By December 1992, GRiD was promoting its new Convertible pen computer. It
ran Windows and provided access to pen-enabled Windows applications. Due to its
ingenious design it was a pen slate when closed, but the screen pivoted upward at
the click of a switch to reveal a complete laptop keyboard. The system weighed
only 5.5 pounds, and an extended battery promised almost three hours of power.
And there was a big 120MB hard disk. I finally got my hands on GRiD Convertible
three days before Christmas of 1992. It came with a suite of pen applications
developed by the now defunct Slate Corporation. I used these scheduler and
notebook applications everywhere I went for the next six months. I had gotten two
batteries and worked out a strategy to allow me to use the system throughout my
business day. In a few weeks I had amassed almost five megabytes of data within
the suite of pen applications alone. It was pen nirvana. I would be at a meeting
and be able to take notes, check my schedule, verify those budget figures, make a
note to my secretary and, during moments of extreme stress, play a game of
Minesweeper.
Disaster struck during a meeting in August of 1993. I had just taken a new
position in my company and we where at a brainstorming session with some of my
new clients. I was taking notes when I detected a faint smell of ozone and a
flicker on the screen. Within minutes the computers response to pen input became
erratic the backlight went dead. I would have to ship the unit off to be fixed
and all my precious pen data was stuck in the machine because it only worked in a
pen machine. My critical data would be lost for the entire time it was out of my
hands. In desperation I backed up the data (not easy without backlight) and
purchased a slightly used NCR 3125 pen computer (The modl shown on
the left is actually a 3115). It only had a 20MB drive but it
was enough for Windows for Pen and my pen stuff. I used the NCR for two weeks. It
was a step back in technology. The non-backlit screen was difficult to read, the
screen was smooth as glass and writing on it felt like, well, writing on glass.
The battery barely held up for 1 hour of continuous use.
Fortunately, my old pen pal Vinny from IS heard of my misfortune and gracefully
agreed to let me test drive a brand new Toshiba T200. By then Vinny was working
for me, so I suspect his motives were advanced by his employment status. Of
course, he also knew that I would test the unit to death. The T200 was a
beautifully crafted computer, with smooth rounded corners, and barely larger than
its 9.5-inch diagonal monochrome VGA display. The Toshiba used an NiMH battery to
give it longevity. And that it would have had the Toshiba engineers kept it a
decent size. Instead they reduced the battery to the size of a pack of
cigarettes, far too small to keep the unit going for more than 1.5 hours. My boss
threatened to toss me and the Toshiba out a window every time the unit started
beeping during our usual marathon meetings. The Toshiba also had an active pen
which took four button batteries to operate. During a test of a preproduction
model, Vinny actually had one explode in his hand. The Toshiba representative
commented that they sort of did that occasionally. The potentially ballistic pen
was otherwise very easy to use and rode in it own silo when not in use. The 80 MB
disk was ample and a complement of port allowed floppy drive, keyboard, and
printer to be attached. I got to use it for about an month and had to give it
back just about the time my boss issued orders that it be banned from our staff
meetings. After its inital ailment, the GRiD Convertible never worked for more
than a week or two at a time. A conventional laptop finally took its place.
By Fall of 1993, I had become seriously depressed over my return into the
dark age of pen and paper. My boss was delighted that my Mont Blanc and notepad
never beeped but I was miserable. That's when I started reading more and more
about PDAs. I became fixated on choosing my next weapon for the war on paper and
spent weeks comparing the features of the two leading PDA architectures, those of
Apple's Newton and Casio's Zoomer. (The Casio Zoomer was also sold as the Tandy Zoomer (shown left); Note how the Zoomer's design
carries over to today's Cassiopeia Pocket PCs.). After much reading I concluded that my PDA had
to be able to do what none of my computers I had ever done successfully: It had
to translate my handwriting into text. Every since grammar school I knew that my
retention skyrocketed whenever I took notes. Hence my main application for the
PDA would be note taking. The recognition was essential because not only did I
actually want to be able to read the notes afterwards, I wanted to be able to
store and retrieve them and share them with others, which necessitated ASCII
text. Ink would only be good in a pinch. Since character-by-character recognition
on pen computers was a poor match for my sloppy writing, I decided that the
Newton's word-based recognizer was the way to go.
By Thanksgiving of 1993, I was the proud owner of an original Newton
MessagePad. Since I am a determined soul I suffered through the learning curve
and achieved reasonable success on good days. As a note pad, the Newton worked
well for me. I loved the schedule application and I trashed my Rolodex cards for
the Newton's Names application. And I used the Newton modem to fax documents I
wanted to print to nearby fax machines. Soon, I ordered the Printer Cable and the
Connection Kit for Windows. With the printer cable, no printer was an island to
my Newton. Between fax machines and PC and Apple printers, I could always produce
paper on demand. However, it was the Connection Kit that really brought things to
life because it made all of the Newton applications available to the PC desktop.
Data can be shared and updated on either the Newton or the PC and then
synchronized between the two. Even with its slow speed and quirky nature it was
great. I turned my calendar over to my secretary and she did all the updates via
PC. I synched with her PC several times each day for updates. We carefully
avoided making double entries by ruling that she commanded my schedule while I
commanded the notepad and names. All meeting schedules went to her for approval
while changes to the names and notepad were up to me. As of April of 1995, I
still use my Newton--now a 110--religiously and I own numerous software
applications.
I am also contemplating yet another Pen Computer. A special one this time.
Small, sleek, a real killer. One that will really fulfill the promise of pen
computing. As soon as I find it, I'll let you know.
Dom Giangrasso with Conrad H. Blickenstorfer.
|